Permissions, not tiers
Access is thirty-two individually named permissions across payments, payouts, settlement, invoicing, approvals, keys, analytics, audit, security and commerce — not three tiers with a support ticket for the exceptions.
More than one person needs to use the business’s funds, and they should not all be able to do the same things. BINK gives a team thirty-two named permissions across seven roles you can extend — tuned per person, revocable, and recorded in a log the business owns.
A starting point, not a ceiling — a business can define its own roles, and tune any person against the role they hold.
Permissions are named for what they let someone do, in the domain they do it in. Reading payouts and creating them are separate answers, because in a real finance team they are.
“Typically held by” describes the built-in roles. Once a business defines its own roles, the mapping is whatever that business decides it is.
The test of an access model is not the day you set it up — it is the day somebody asks who could have done this, and when that changed.
Access is thirty-two individually named permissions across payments, payouts, settlement, invoicing, approvals, keys, analytics, audit, security and commerce — not three tiers with a support ticket for the exceptions.
The seven built-in roles are a starting point. A company role carries its own permission set, so access can match how the business is actually organised.
A member can be granted a permission their role does not carry, or have one revoked from it. The exception is part of the record rather than a second account created to work around the rule.
Joining is by an emailed invitation whose token is stored hashed and expires on its own. Nothing is shared, and an unaccepted invitation does not stay live indefinitely.
The business can be handed to another member deliberately, as a recorded action — so a company is never stranded behind one person’s login.
Every role change, suspension, removal and policy edit writes to a company audit log with the actor, their role, their address and the before and after — readable by the business and exportable as CSV.
Worth being exact, because "team wallets" could be read as separate balances, and because permissions and spending limits are different mechanisms.
Wallets are held at company level, one per currency — there is no per-member or per-team balance. Spend policies can be defined but are not enforced at card authorisation today, so per-person spending limits are not claimed here.
Where the money sits, and what it is doing.
How money leaves, and who may move it.
What happened, and what still needs a decision.
Named permissions, roles you define, exceptions on the record, and a log that answers the question a year later.